|
Deals Coursepage Fall 2006
Guidelines for writing papers
Syllabus
There's no reading assignment for the first class. I'll hand out a case study in class, and we'll take it from there.
********************************************************
Deals: Engineering Financial Transactions
Fall 2006
Professor Victor Fleischer
4 credit hours
Tuesdays and Thursdays from 1:00 pm to 2:40 pm, Classroom 206
REVISED AS OF September 20, 2006
Deals: Engineering Financial Transactions. 4 pts. Why are corporate transactions structured in the way that they are? This class explores the business lawyer's role in (1) creating value by helping clients identify, assess, and manage business risks through efficient contract design while (2) simultaneously achieving the optimal legal, tax or regulatory treatment for the deal. The course includes case studies of actual transactions. There will be a final exam (closed book, multiple choice/short answer), a group presentation, and a group paper. Willingness to work cooperatively in teams is essential.
This course examines how transactional lawyers create value by engineering deals. The course is organized in four modules.
Class Structure
The first module will focus on understanding barriers to contracting – including information problems, transaction costs, enforceability, strategic behavior, contracting over time – and a range of responses, such as option theory, decision theory, risk management, incentive alignment, and techniques for reducing information asymmetries.
The second module will explore the importance of reputation in deal-making and the effect that deal structure can have on labor markets and product markets.
The third module will be devoted to understanding the lawyer’s role in “regulatory cost engineering” — exploiting the gap between the economic substance of a deal and its treatment for tax, accounting, regulatory or other legal purposes.
The fourth module will use case studies of actual transactions and will require close analysis of deal documents. You will be expected to write a substantial paper, working in teams, analyzing one of the deals. You will also be expected to present the deal to the rest of the class.
Grading and Class Participation
Grading is based as follows: 30% for the final exam, 40% for the group paper, 10% for the group presentation, and 20% on class participation.
Group Papers
A draft of the paper is due a week before your presentation. The final papers should be about 10,000-15,000 words, including footnotes. Please read the separate memo about writing the papers.
Group Presentations
The presentation should provide the other students in the class with relevant background information about the company or industry and explain the important deal points. Please leave ample time for Q&A.
If you plan on using Powerpoint, please coordinate in advance with the IT and Audio/Visual department.
Final Exam
The final exam will be a take-home exam. It may cover material from any course module, including the group presentations.
| Class |
Topic |
Reading |
| |
|
|
Class 1 Tuesday August 29 |
Introduction: The Role of the Transactional Lawyer |
Javaboost (distributed in class) |
| |
MODULE ONE
|
MANAGING INFORMATION & BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS |
Class 2
Thursday
August 31 |
Transaction Cost Engineering |
Ronald J. Gilson, Value Creation by Business Lawyers: Legal Skills and Asset Pricing, 94 Yale L. J. 239, 239-56 (1984). |
Class 3
Tuesday
September 5 |
Planning the Venture |
Streetwatch (case study) |
Class 4
Thursday
September 7 |
Asymmetric Information |
Ronald J. Gilson, Engineering a Venture Capital Market: Lessons from the American Experience, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 1067, 1067-92 (2003)
Limited Partnership Agreement |
Class 5
Tuesday
September 12 |
Agency Costs |
D. Gordon Smith, Corporate Governance and Managerial Incompetence: Lessons from Kmart, 74 N.C. L. Rev. 1037, 1046-57 (1996) |
Class 6
Thursday
September 14 |
Option Theory and Moral Hazard |
Excerpt, Black & Gilson, The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions (Chapter 7, The Option Perspective)
Credit Lyonnais v. Pathe Comm. Corp., 17 Del. J. Corp. L. 1099 (1991) |
Class 7
Tuesday
Sept 19
|
Imperfect Markets |
Asymmetric Information: Market Failures, Market Distortions, and Market Solutions (HBS Case) |
Class 8
Thursday
Sep 21
|
Corporate Acquisition Agreements |
Gilson, Value Creation (cont.)
Form of Acquisition Agreement
|
| |
MODULE TWO
|
REPUTATION |
Class 9
Tuesday
Sep 26
|
Third Parties and the Renting of Reputation |
Gilson, Value Creation (cont.)
Gilson & Kraakman, Mechanisms of Market Efficiency, 70 Va. L. Rev. 549, 602-05, 613-21 (1984) |
Class 10
Thursday
Sep 28 |
Long Term Contracts |
Parker v. Twentieth Century Fox |
Tuesday
Oct 3
|
Case Study Prep |
Brainstorming Sessions [I will not be present] |
Class 11
Thursday
Oct 5
|
Branding |
Victor Fleischer, Brand New Deal: The Branding Effect of Corporate Deal Structures, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1581 (2006). |
| |
MODULE THREE |
REGULATORY COST ENGINEERING |
Class 12
Tuesday
Oct 10
|
Capital Structure |
Michael C. Jensen, Eclipse of the Public Corporation (SSRN version 1989 rev. 1997) |
Class 13
Thursday
Oct 12 |
Regulatory Incentives & Frictions |
David M. Schizer, Frictions as a Constraint on Tax Planning, 101 COLUM. L. REV. 1312, 1312-39 (2001). |
Class 14
Tuesday
Oct 17 |
Securitizations
|
Claire A. Hill, Securitizations: Low Cost Sweetener for Lemons |
Class 15
Thursday
Oct 19 |
Derivatives and Hedging
|
Southwest Airlines (case study). |
Class 16
Tuesday
Oct 24 |
Antitrust |
Victor Fleischer, The MasterCard IPO: Protecting the Priceless Brand (working paper)
Joshua D. Wright, MasterCard’s Single Entity Strategy (working paper)
|
Class 17
Thursday
Oct 26
|
The Ethics of Regulatory Cost Engineering |
Tanina Rostain, Travails in Tax: KPMG and the Tax-Shelter Controversy, in LEGAL ETHICS: LAW STORIES (Deborah L. Rhode & David J. Luban eds.) |
|
MODULE FOUR
|
CASE STUDIES |
Class 18
Tuesday
Oct 31
|
Case Study #1: Vulcan |
Group 1 Presentation:
- Hana Jung
- Nicki Kao
- Lisa Lewis
- Mario Nicolais
- Steven Sewalk
- Challon Winer
|
Class 19
Thursday
Nov 2 |
Case Study #1 |
Steve Hall, Vulcan Capital |
Class 20
Tuesday
Nov 7
|
Case Study #2: Holiday |
Group 2 Presentation: Holiday
City of Boulder -BHP Agreements, Tax Credits
- James Crowe
- Brooke Mallett
- Andrew Pouzeshi
- Michael Smeenk
- Brandon McKnight
- Mark Walker
|
Class 21
Thursday
Nov 9
|
Case Study #2 |
Cindy Brown, Boulder Housing Partners |
Class 22
Tuesday
Nov 14 |
Case Study #3: Holiday |
Group 3 Presentation: Holiday
BHP - Contractor/Subdeveloper agreements
- Richard Murray
- Justin Pless
- Josh Finkelstein
- Adam Lieber
- Lauren Iveson
- Chris Sharp
|
Class 23
Thursday
Nov 16 |
Case Study #3 |
[tbd] |
Class 24
Tuesday
Nov 28 |
Case Study #4: Mobius |
Group 4 Presentation:
- Mike Ross
- Paulina Proper
- Gabe Lopez
- Alex Volpe
- Maxine Vasil
- Horst Loeblich
|
Class 25
Thursday
Nov 30 |
Case Study #4 |
Brad Feld, Mobius Venture Capital |
Class 26
Tuesday
Dec 5 |
Case Study #5: REI |
Group 5 Presentation:
- Jeff Dougan
- Katie Crenshaw
- Katie Duran
- Laurie Mazurkiewicz
- Chad McAfee
- Tara Righetti
|
Class 27
Thursday
Dec 7 |
Case Study #5 |
Guest Lecturer |
| Class 28 |
Tbd |
GovWorks Discussion
Screening and discussion of Startup.com. |
| |
|
|
| |
Sample Papers |
Deals Paper Guidelines
MasterCard IPO, Georgetown Students F2005
Chipotle Spin-off Slides, UCLA Students S2006
Disney-Pixar Merger, UCLA Students S2006
Disney-Pixar Slides, UCLA Students S2006 |
|

Links |